Listen to the deep-dive discussion – Making billions without doing a damn thing (23:18 min)

“$35 billion became $185 billion. We did not do a damn thing. That’s the way we like it.”

— Warren Buffett, Omaha, May 2026

1. Cook Was in the Room

Tim Cook was in the room when Buffett said it.

Omaha, May 2026. The 60th anniversary of Berkshire Hathaway. Forty thousand shareholders gathered. Buffett, now Chairman since January, sat with the directors on the floor. When they passed him the microphone, he spoke about Apple:

“$35 billion became $185 billion. We did not do a damn thing. That’s the way we like it.”

Cook had already announced his departure as CEO, effective September. Fifteen years. Thousands of decisions. Sixty-five years old.

Buffett held Apple for the same fifteen years. He made one decision: buy. Then he did nothing.

“That’s the way we like it.”

2. The A and the B

Every stock has two components.

The A — the toll, the current earnings power, the short duration. What the business produces today.

The B — the growth, the compounding, the future. What the business will produce tomorrow.

Every stock has both. A value stock with no growth still has an A. A growth stock burning cash still has a B (or the promise of one). The question is never whether a stock has an A or a B. They all do.

The question is: what is the quality of each, and what does each cost?

III. The Cost of the A

The A — the toll — varies enormously.

Some businesses have a powerful A. A toll protected by a moat, by network effects, by regulation, by habit. Visa’s toll on every transaction. MSCI’s toll on every indexed dollar. Moody’s toll on every bond issued.

Some businesses have a weak A. A toll exposed to competition, to commoditization, to disruption. The local retailer undercut by Amazon. The manufacturer squeezed by cheaper imports.

But even among powerful A’s, there is a difference: what does the A cost to maintain?

Coca-Cola has a powerful A. The brand is iconic. The distribution is global. The habit is ingrained. But maintaining that A costs $4-5 billion per year in marketing. Without that spending, Pepsi gains. The toll exists, but it must be defended.

Visa has a powerful A. The network is ubiquitous. The duopoly is locked in. The toll collects on every swipe. And maintaining that A costs… almost nothing. The toll defends itself. The network effects strengthen with use.

Two powerful A’s. Two radically different costs.

IV. The Cost of the B

The B — the growth — also varies.

Some businesses have a strong B. A wave carrying them forward. Digitization for Visa. Passivization for MSCI. Global credit expansion for Moody’s.

Some businesses have a weak B. A market that is saturated, declining, or threatened. The cigarette company with a shrinking addressable market. The legacy media company disrupted by streaming.

Some businesses have no B at all. A wonderful toll, but no growth. These are the classic value stocks — return OF capital, not return ON capital. Buy them cheap enough and you can still profit. But they do not compound.

And again, even among strong B’s, there is a difference: what does the B cost?

BNSF has a real B. The American economy grows. Freight volumes increase. The railroad expands. But that B costs billions in capex — rails, locomotives, maintenance, efficiency improvements. The growth is real. The cost is also real.

Visa has a real B. The world digitizes. Cash disappears. The toll expands. And that B costs… nothing. Visa does not spend to make the world digitize. The wave carries the business forward without effort.

Two real B’s. Two radically different costs.

V. The Matrix

This creates a matrix.

Most analysis focuses on quality. Is the moat wide? Is the growth real?

The framework adds a second dimension: cost. What does it take to keep the A? What does it take to produce the B?

Two stocks can have comparable quality — both with strong A’s and real B’s — but radically different costs. And over time, the difference in cost becomes the difference in compounding.

The expensive A drains resources. The expensive B demands capex. The margin narrows. The return on capital declines. The compounding slows.

The free A needs no defense. The free B arrives without spending. The margin holds. The return on capital stays high. The compounding accelerates.

VI. The Hierarchy of Free Growth

There is a hierarchy to free growth, and Buffett revealed it without naming it.

When an investor owns a stock, the B — the growth — can be free in different ways. Not all free is equal.

Level 1: The B is free for the company and the investor.

No one works. The company doesn’t spend to grow. The investor doesn’t decide. The wave carries both.

Visa doesn’t spend to make the world digitize. MSCI doesn’t invest to make investors passivize. The toll collects itself. The wave does the work.

Level 2: The B is mechanical for the company, but free for the investor.

Someone works — but not the investor. The company spends, decides, executes. The investor watches.

Apple spends billions on R&D, supply chain, product development. Tim Cook makes thousands of decisions. Buffett makes none.

“We did not do a damn thing.”

Level 3: The B is mechanical for everyone.

The company works. The investor depends on the company working. Everyone is chained to the machine.

BNSF requires efficiency, capex, competitive positioning. GEICO requires marketing, underwriting, constant defense. The managers work. The allocator allocates. No one is free.

VII. What Buffett Built

Buffett, in Omaha, described Level 2. He described the experience of owning Apple — the experience of doing nothing while someone else does everything.

And he said: “That’s the way we like it.”

But Berkshire is not Level 2. Berkshire is mostly Level 3.

Look at what Buffett built over sixty years:

BNSF — a powerful A (rail network, regulatory moat), a real B (economic growth). But the A requires constant maintenance, and the B demands heavy capex. Level 3.

GEICO — a powerful A (scale, direct model), a real B (market share gains). But the A requires marketing, and the B requires underwriting discipline. Level 3.

Berkshire Energy — a powerful A (regulated utilities), a real B (energy transition). But the A requires regulatory navigation, and the B demands infrastructure investment. Level 3.

Apple — a powerful A (ecosystem lock-in), a real B (services growth). The A and B are expensive for Apple. But for Buffett? “We did not do a damn thing.” Level 2.

Moody’s — a powerful A (duopoly, regulatory entrenchment), a real B (global credit expansion). And both are free. No one does a damn thing. Level 1. But it’s 3% of the portfolio.

Buffett prefers Level 2. He said so from the floor. But he built Level 3.

VIII. The Vocabulary of the Mechanical

Later that same day, the CEO of BNSF took the stage.

She spoke about the railroad’s performance. She used a particular vocabulary:

“Efficiency.”

“Competitive cost structure.”

“Widening gap with competition.”

This is the vocabulary of expensive A’s and expensive B’s. Someone must work. Someone must optimize. Someone must run faster than the other.

The Freesurfer has no vocabulary. It has only the wave.

Visa doesn’t talk about efficiency. The A is free. Visa doesn’t talk about competitive cost structure. There is no competition — just a duopoly. Visa doesn’t talk about widening the gap. The B widens itself, because 85% of the world still transacts in cash.

The CEO of BNSF must speak because both the A and the B cost something.

The CEO of Visa could say nothing and both would continue.

IX. Berkshire’s Geometry

Berkshire has a particular geometry.

The A is rich. It includes float from insurance, earnings from subsidiaries that can be reinvested at high internal returns, and dividends from stocks like Apple and Coca-Cola. The A is powerful and diversified.

The B is complicated.

BRK = A (float + earnings + dividends) + B₁ (BNSF) + B₂ (GEICO) + B₃ (Energy) + B₄ (Apple) + B₅ (Moody’s)…

The B is additive. It is a sum of many engines.

And each engine has its own cost structure. The sum looks like long duration because there are many pieces, and many of them grow.

But most of the B’s are expensive. Each piece requires capex, decisions, effort. The growth is real. The cost is also real.

X. The Freesurfer’s Geometry

The Freesurfer has a different geometry.

Visa = A (toll) × B (digitization)

The A is free. The toll collects itself. The duopoly is locked in. No spending required to maintain.

The B is free. The wave carries the business forward. No capex required to grow.

And the structure is multiplicative. Not many engines. One wave. Not additive pieces. A single structural force.

XI. The Pricing Paradox

This creates a pricing paradox.

Berkshire trades at PE 15. Visa trades at PE 29.

The market sees Berkshire as cheap and Visa as expensive.

But what is the market actually pricing?

Berkshire at PE 15: A powerful A that requires management. Real B’s that require capex. A sum of engines that require decisions. A system that required Buffett to build and will require Abel to maintain. Succession risk, complexity, mechanical cost.

The market sees all of this. The market prices it at PE 15. This is not a discount. This is correct pricing for what Berkshire is — an extraordinary collection of mechanical businesses that require extraordinary management.

Visa at PE 29: A powerful A that costs nothing. A real B that arrives for free. A single wave, not a sum of engines. No genius required, no succession risk, no mechanical cost.

The market sees PE 29 and calls it expensive. But what is it missing?

Berkshire looks cheap. It is correctly priced.

Visa looks expensive. It is structurally undervalued. The apparent bargain is not a bargain. The apparent premium is actually a gift.

XII. Why Level 3?

Why did Buffett build Level 3 when he preferred Level 2?

Several reasons.

Scale. Berkshire has $300 billion+ to deploy. The Freesurfers are too small to absorb that capital. You cannot put $100 billion into MSCI.

Era. Buffett started in 1965. The Freesurfers — Visa, Mastercard, MSCI, S&P Global — did not exist as public companies. He built with what was available.

Temperament. Buffett loves operations. He loves managers. He loves businesses he can “understand.” BNSF is tangible. GEICO is tangible. The toll roads of the information age are less visible.

Float. The insurance model generates free capital. But deploying that capital at scale requires buying entire businesses. And most entire businesses have expensive A’s and expensive B’s.

So Buffett built a system where he is free — through delegation. The managers run BNSF. The managers run GEICO. Buffett allocates.

But the system itself is not free. The managers must work. The A’s must be maintained. The B’s must be paid for. The mechanical must continue. Buffett liberated himself. He did not liberate the system.

XIII. The Human Cost

There is a human cost to the mechanical.

Tim Cook ran Apple for fifteen years. He maintained the A and produced the B. He managed the supply chain, the product launches, the R&D investments, the thousand decisions per year that kept both running.

Buffett held Apple for the same fifteen years. He made one decision.

Cook stepping down at sixty-five. After everything.

Buffett, at ninety-five, still present. Still engaged. Still sitting with the directors.

“We did not do a damn thing. That’s the way we like it.”

Cook did everything. Buffett did nothing. Both got rich. But one gave fifteen years of his life. The other gave a signature.

The mechanical extracts a human toll. From Cook. From the CEO of BNSF with her vocabulary of efficiency. From the managers of GEICO and the operators of Berkshire Energy. Someone must pay for the expensive A. Someone must pay for the expensive B. The Freesurfer extracts nothing. Not from the investor. Not from the company. Both the A and the B are free. The wave carries everyone.

XIV. Not a Criticism

This is not a criticism of Berkshire. It is not a criticism of Buffett.

The mechanical worked. Spectacularly.

Buffett: $140 billion. Munger: $2.5 billion. Shareholders since 1965: 4,000,000%+.

The mechanical — even with its expensive A’s and expensive B’s — created extraordinary wealth. For Buffett. For Munger. For anyone who held through sixty years.

But it required something.

It required Buffett.

Without Buffett — without the greatest capital allocator in history making excellent decisions for six decades — Berkshire would be an ordinary insurance company. The expensive A’s and B’s work when a genius manages them.

The question is: can it be repeated?

The mechanical requires the extraordinary. It requires the genius. It requires sixty years of excellent decisions.

The Freesurfer requires nothing. Not genius. Not excellent decisions. Not sixty years. Just the wave. And one question, asked once a year: Is the wave still there?

XV. What Buffett Searched For

Buffett searched for free growth his entire life. He found it once, lived it once, saw clearly what he preferred.

He found it in Moody’s — a true Freesurfer, Level 1, where neither the A nor the B costs anything. But he kept it small.

He lived it in Apple — Level 2, where Cook paid for the A and the B, and Buffett watched. And he said, from the floor, that this was the way he liked it.

He understood Coca-Cola — the A is powerful, the B is real, but both cost billions to maintain and produce.

He built sixty years of Level 3 — an accumulation of excellent businesses, each with powerful A’s and real B’s, each with real costs.

The framework names what Buffett searched for.

It names the levels — who is free and who works.

It names the geometry — additive versus multiplicative, aggregate versus singular.

It names the costs — what the A requires to exist, and what the B requires to arrive.

Buffett felt it. He described it from the floor. He said he liked it. But he never had the word.

XVI. Level 1

“$35 billion became $185 billion. We did not do a damn thing. That’s the way we like it.”

Yes.

But the Freesurfer goes further.

Buffett did not do a damn thing. But Cook did everything — maintained the A, produced the B, paid the costs of both.

In Level 1, no one does a damn thing. Not the investor. Not the company. Not the CEO.

The A is free. The B is free. The wave does the work. The toll collects itself.

Berkshire at PE 15 looks like a bargain. It is the correct price for mechanical excellence.

Visa at PE 29 looks expensive. It is a structural gift hiding in plain sight.

That’s the way we like it too.

But we don’t need to be Buffett to get it.

Averaging Up

Watch the Video

averagingup.com